There are many real-world problems involving this theory. One is
who you choose to disclose private information to; choosing a confidant can be
tricky depending on the content of the private information that can be
potentially disclosed and there’s a chance the confidant is reluctant to hear
the information.
Also, the issue of breaking of mutual privacy boundaries being
broken after one discloses information with another is always possible. When
people do not set up specific privacy boundaries between one another, discrepancies
in the private information can occur, and these can have consequences: broken
friendships, personal secrets or information being made public, etc. The
turbulence after a breach in privacy can differ in severity, but there are many
real-world applications of turbulence as well. If one co-owner of private
information discloses it against the boundaries set, the other co-owner(s) can respond
in non-constructive ways, but that is their right. Here’s an example of
boundary breaking and turbulence:
No comments:
Post a Comment